care fees

North East Residents Lose Out The Most When Selling Property To Pay Care Fees

People in the North East of England who sell property to pay care fees in old age use up their property’s value quicker than anywhere else in the UK, according to recent figures.

Many people in later life have to sell their home (unless they have a partner still living in it) to meet the costs of residential care. Only if you have less than £23,250 in assets can you apply to the local authority for means-tested assistance.

According to figures from the insurer Royal London, the average length of stay in a care home is two and a half years. This will eat up more than half the value of the average North East property. And that is a higher proportion than anywhere else in the country.

Royal London calculated that average care fees for in the North East over two and a half years are £71,993. This amounts to 56 per cent of the average property price in the region (£128,631).

One in ten 65-year-olds face future lifetime care costs of more than £100,000. Which means the average property owner in the North East will use up virtually all of their property assets paying for care in less than four years.

Care fees for the average stay may be higher in London at £86,612. But this is only 18 per cent of the average London property price of £484,000. In the South East less than 30 per cent of the average property value will go into paying for care.

“These figures illustrate just how important it is to ensure people in the North East are getting all the care funding assistance they are entitled to,” says Rosalind Hughes, head of Just Caring Legal. The Sunderland-based firm specialises in the recovery of wrongly paid care fees all over the UK.

“People seem to think that they have to pay for all of their care if they have assets. But this is not always the case. There are many people funding their own care who should be eligible for NHS Continuing Healthcare (CHC) funding,” Rosalind continues.

“People who need care due to a primary health need, such as a more complex illness or disability, should receive NHS CHC regardless of how many assets or savings they have. It is not means-tested at all. The problem is many people are not aware of it, or wrongly believe they are not eligible for it.

“It would appear that some NHS Clinical Commissioning Groups are failing to follow national guidelines and case law when assessing people for NHS CHC and so denying people this much needed funding.”

“People work all their lives to pay off their mortgage so they have something to leave behind. Then they find the whole lot eaten up in care fees in a few short years. In many cases those fees should have been paid by the NHS,” says Rosalind.

“This is one of the main reasons I set up Just Caring Legal. We give vulnerable individuals and their families a voice. And we can deal on their behalf with the NHS and local authorities over complex care funding issues.”

Contact Just Caring Legal on 0191 5 561 078 if you need further advice or visit the website at www.justcaringlegal.co.uk.

North East Residents Lose Out The Most When Selling Property To Pay Care Fees Read More »

How Do We Build A Truly Dementia-Friendly NHS Continuing Healthcare system?

Tackling the legal issues facing those in need of care is our daily business here at Just Caring Legal. People usually enter the health and social care system when they are at their most vulnerable – and perhaps never more so than when they are living with the effects of dementia.

Dementia progresses in a way that is unique to each individual and different types of dementia affect the brain at different rates and in different ways. But one thing that has been brought home to me in the course of my work is that someone’s experience of dementia will crucially depend on their personal circumstances, the support they receive, the people around them and the environment in which they live.

Since launching Just Caring Legal last year, I have been lucky enough to meet a wide range of individuals and organisations that devote their lives to making the world a less daunting, more welcoming place for people living with dementia and their families.

One such organisation is Dementia Alliance International. This is a non-profit group of people with dementia. Members of DAI come from all around the world and they seek to represent, support, and educate others living with the disease. Anyone with a diagnosis of dementia can join for free.

Dementia Alliance International was founded by the formidable Kate Swaffer. Kate was 49 years old when she was diagnosed with a form of younger onset dementia. She set up her excellent website to help others – but also to help herself. In her own (very wise) words: “I write to stay inspired, to share my thoughts, to remind me of who I really am, and to keep tabs on my life, my thoughts and my philosophies so that later on, I can remember what it is I was thinking or doing.” I was delighted to contribute this guest blog for their UK members. A blog for our UK members – Dementia Alliance International

Maintaining our autonomy and quality of life in the face of dementia is partly about how we interact with the world. But it also depends on how the world interacts with us. This is why the Alzheimer’s Society’s Dementia Friends programme is also doing vital and life-changing work. Through connecting with Claire Ford and her work with Dementia Friends I have learned much more than I ever thought possible about the small ways we can help to transform lives. Every action counts.

Dementia Friends is the biggest ever attempt to change people’s perceptions of dementia. Its aim is nothing less than to transform the way the nation thinks, acts and talks about the condition. This means tackling the stigma and lack of understanding that many people experience, which inevitably lead to loneliness, social exclusion and injustice. Unfortunately, injustice is something that occurs regularly for people with dementia.

What I have learned as a solicitor specialising in the recovery of wrongly paid care fees is that without this understanding, people’s experience of finding the required level of support for their dementia-related needs can be extremely difficult and sometimes distressing.

Many people don’t realise that there is full NHS funding available for care and nursing home fees where an adult needs ongoing support outside hospital as a result of disability, accident or illness. This funding, called NHS Continuing Healthcare (CHC) is not means-tested and is managed and distributed locally by NHS Care Commissioning Groups (CCGs).

A recent report from the Continuing Healthcare Alliance (which counts Dementia UK, the Alzheimer’s Society and AgeUK among its members) found that 60% of the people it surveyed people did not know about the existence of NHS Continuing Healthcare funding until very late on in their journey through the health and social care system. When they did find out, it was usually by chance or being told about it by a friend. Only 3% of respondents said they found out about NHS Continuing Healthcare funding from their GP, 5% found out from their clinician, and 11% from their social worker.

Moreover, access to NHS CHC funding can be a particular struggle for people living with dementia. Since its introduction, the application and assessment process for NHS Continuing Healthcare funding has been incredibly complex. Navigating this legal process can be a daunting, time-consuming and perplexing experience – even for those who have support.

Some are lucky enough to be found eligible, while others with similar levels of need have to fund their own care or rely on local authority funding, which is means-tested and often needs to be “topped up”.

The report by the Continuing Healthcare Alliance (which counts Dementia UK, the Alzheimer’s Society and AgeUK among its members) concluded that the NHS CHC Continuing Healthcare system is failing people with dementia across the country. Entitled Continuing to Care? , it describes how many people are being unfairly denied this desperately needed support.

This is mainly because the criteria for assessing NHS CHC eligibility, which hinges on the person having care needs arising from a “primary health need”, leaves too much room for interpretation. While the National Framework for NHS continuing healthcare and NHS funded nursing care has been in place since 2007 to give guidance to CCGs, in reality there is very little consistency in decision-making.

NHS Continuing Healthcare is not dependent on having a particular diagnosis, such as dementia. It is based on a full assessment of the nature, complexity, severity and unpredictability of someone’s overall care needs.

Yet the Continuing Healthcare Alliance found that people with dementia are regularly incorrectly denied NHS CHC on the grounds that their care needs are a “routine” part of their condition and its progression and therefore outside the scope of NHS CHC. This is not necessarily the case.

The National Framework also makes it clear that just because needs are being well-managed, this does not mean they are no longer a factor. Nevertheless, the Continuing Healthcare Alliance reports people with dementia having their NHS CHC withdrawn because their condition has “improved or stabilised or even stayed the same”, even where this is a reversible phenomenon purely down to the skilled interventions of trained carers.

The report concludes that “It’s essential that rapid and robust changes are made to improve the current system”. These include rewriting the Decision Support Tool on which decisions on NHS CHC are based; and delivering a mandatory programme of training for professionals who organise and assess people for NHS CHC to ensure they fully understand the eligibility process.

Ultimately, they say the NHS England and the Department of Health must do more to ensure packages of care are “needs-driven and not purely financially motivated”.

Only then will we be able to say that we have a care system for all that is truly dementia-friendly and that it should treat every individual with empathy, dignity and respect for their own wishes and needs.

These are the problems we are committed to addressing here at Just Caring Legal. We provide advice, guidance and help to enable people to navigate through a complicated care system. We are committed to treating every individual with honesty and respect, listening to their stories carefully and responding with clear, jargon-free support.

If you wish to speak to us about your individual experience of looking after someone with complex healthcare needs or you are seeking a refund of wrongly paid care fees and you wish to find out how we can assist you, please call us on 0191 556 1078.

How Do We Build A Truly Dementia-Friendly NHS Continuing Healthcare system? Read More »

Claiming Back Care Fees for Past Periods of Care

Here at Just Caring Legal, we get many enquiries about the possibility of claiming back care fees for past periods when they or a relative were eligible for NHS Continuing Healthcare funding but didn’t receive it. The good news is that yes, it is possible, but it depends on the particular facts of the case. Claiming back care fees on behalf of someone who has died is also possible. The bad news is, you can no longer claim back care fees for periods of care in England before 31 March 2012. The Government set a deadline for claims up to this date back in 2013. The Welsh Government, meanwhile, has stipulated that retrospective NHS Continuing Healthcare claims could cover a period no longer than 12 months back from the date of application for review. Here are some brief answers to some of the other questions people often ask .

How is a retrospective claim for NHS Continuing Healthcare assessed?

Claims are assessed by a nurse reviewer, who should look thoroughly through all care notes, health reports and records from carers, GP, hospital clinicians and so on – plus any evidence the family provides. The assessor then compiles a needs portrayal document, This should be a comprehensive picture of the individual’s needs across the whole time period.  The assessor will share this with the applicant, requesting confirmation of the content and inviting any comments they wish to add. There may well be a tight deadline for this feedback. Do not ignore it as it may delay your claim further. The reviewer will make a recommendation to the multidisciplinary panel of health and social care professionals, who should accept it unless there are exceptional circumstances.

How much of a priority is a retrospective claim for the CCG?

As well as going through this process for retrospective claims, the CCG also has to deal with current assessments for NHS Continuing Healthcare. According to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman, “We expect the NHS to prioritise current cases (where the person is still alive and needs ongoing care) over past cases where there is no longer a need for financial help with care needs.”

When will the backlog of retrospective claims be cleared?

When the Government announced it was setting a deadline for claims in England, CCGs received a flood of new claims dating back as far as 2004. NHS England has imposed a deadline of 31 March 2017 to clear the backlog. But many CCGs have struggled to handle the deluge of cases – most are complex and involve gathering historical evidence from a  range of sources. The Ombudsman said: “We would expect NHS organisations to keep people informed about the progress of their claim.”

What if you are unhappy with the decision on your retrospective claim?

If you disagree with the decision the NHS makes about your retrospective claim for care fees, you may be able to challenge it. Any challenge should initially be through the CCG complaints and appeals process. After that, if you remain dissatisfied, you may be able to ask the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman to look into your concerns. Here at Just Caring Legal we regularly help people with retrospective claims and appeals. Fill in our initial questionnaire and we will contact you immediately to provide bespoke advice and discuss your options.

Claiming Back Care Fees for Past Periods of Care Read More »

How Much Longer can Families be Squeezed to Provide Extra Cash for Care?

Cash for care.

Here at Just Caring Legal, a solicitor’s firm specialising in the recovery of care home fees, we are all too aware of the fragile state of the residential adult social care market. This leaves us to question, how much longer can families be squeezed to provide extra cash for care?

It was confirmed in October 2016, in the State of Care report by the Care Quality Commission, the adult social care watchdog. The report concluded that the whole sector was at “tipping point” due to cuts to local authority funding. It also warned of a wave of care home closures in the near future if the crisis was not addressed with urgency.

Additionally, the CQC warned, this shipwreck of Titanic proportions was in danger of taking the whole NHS down with it. This was as hospital “bed-blocking” hit record highs. This was due mainly to the lack of social care places to which elderly patients could be safely discharged.

Need for action.

There are more calls for action every day. Next week the CQC chief executive himself is among those giving oral evidence to the House of Commons inquiry into Adult Social Care funding, which is looking into the financial sustainability of local authority social care and the quality of that care. We doubt his testimony will make easy listening for many of those living in the Westminster Bubble.

Let’s hope this absolutely vital inquiry comes up with some radical solutions – and soon. As government funding dwindles, it is elderly people in care and their families who are squeezed ever harder for extra cash to fill the funding gap.

The future of fees.

According to analysts, fees are increasing at a rate of around 10% a year. But cash-strapped councils are not increasing care funding to keep pace with these rises.

There have been a number of cases reported by the Local Government Ombudsman, who investigates complaints about local authority decisions under the Care Act, where councils have effectively forced families to pay extra out of their own pockets when their loved one’s care home fees rise above the level the council is willing to pay. Many are told: either pay a top-up fee or find your relative somewhere cheaper to live.

In most cases this is illegal. The LGO states a council must follow numerous steps before a top-up fee can be charged due to a fee increase.  First, is a full assessment to decide whether the resident can be moved without detriment to their wellbeing. If they cannot, then the LGO is clear that the council should continue to pay the higher cost of care. When decided that a move would not necessarily be detrimental, the council must offer the resident an available affordable place. This is where no top-up fee is required and all of their eligible needs must be met. When no such place is available, the resident should be able to stay without a third party top-up fee.

Finding support.

If you are experiencing problems with top-up fees, we are here to help. We specialise in care home fee recovery. Just Caring Legal provide a strong and persuasive voice for families in complex dealings with councils over care home funding. We construct robust arguments to challenge care plan decisions and wrongful top-up fee demands on behalf of residents and their families. We offer strong advocacy and guidance through what can be a stressful time.

If you think you need this kind of help then get in touch today on 01915 561 078 or email [email protected].

How Much Longer can Families be Squeezed to Provide Extra Cash for Care? Read More »