Factsheets

How to navigate the NHS Continuing Healthcare system – and identify when you need help

NHS Continuing Healthcare (CHC) is a fully funded package of care provided by the NHS outside of hospital settings for individuals who have significant ongoing health but also social care needs. It can be provided either at home or in a care home, and it is available to everyone who needs it, regardless of income or assets.

When are you likely to need an NHS CHC assessment?

Someone may need an assessment after they leave hospital, if it becomes clear they have ongoing health-related care needs. In this case, they will usually be assessed after discharge and a period of recovery.

But they may also need an assessment for CHC even if they are already in a care home or receiving care at home. It all depends on the extent and severity of their care needs and whether they are primarily healthcare related.

While many people go through this assessment process without any professional help, many others run into problems. They feel they are not being fully included in the process or that their views on the care needed are being ignored or downplayed.

Get in touch if: you feel you are being unfairly treated or marginalised at any stage of the process. Depending on the needs, we can look at your case and provide

  • an assessment of its strengths and/or weaknesses
  • advice and guidance, or
  • full advocacy.

1. The initial screening (checklist)

Usually called the CHC checklist, this is done by a health or social care professional (such as a nurse or social worker). It helps quickly evaluate whether the individual is eligible for a full assessment for NHS CHC. The checklist briefly summarises their health and care needs across various domains such as mobility, communication, nutrition, psychological and medication and scores these A, B, or C according to broadly how much and what kind of care they need.

If this checklist scores “positive” (2 or more domains scored as A, 5 or more domains scored as B, or one A and 4 B, or one “priority” domain scored A), they are then entitled to a full assessment by a Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT).

You can find the government checklist guidance here or check out our Resources section for free factsheets and useful links.

Get in touch if:

  • you think an individual should have had a checklist but has been denied one
  • their checklist was inaccurate and they were wrongly denied a full assessment.

They may be eligible retrospectively for an “unassessed period of care”. We can carry out a full assessment of the paperwork to assess your chances of success.

2. The full assessment (Decision Support Tool)

This is a comprehensive evaluation of all the individual’s care needs across a range of physical and mental healthcare domains. It is conducted by a multidisciplinary team (MDT), which usually includes a nurse trained in CHC assessments and a social worker at least. The assessment must be person-centred, listening carefully to the views of the individual and any supporting family members. It must be holistic and wide-ranging, consider how different needs interact, and take into account the views of any health and social care professionals involved in the care. The members must strive to reach agreement when scoring the 12 domains, with scores ranging from No Needs to High, Severe or Priority in different areas.

The MDT should assess the needs in great detail, focusing on:

  • The nature of the needs
  • The severity and frequency of the needs
  • The complexity of care needs and the challenges carers face in meeting them
  • The unpredictability of the needs.

The MDT will input all this information into a document called a Decision Support Tool (DST) to help decide whether the individual has a “primary health need”. This means that the healthcare needs are of a kind, intensity, complexity or unpredictability that they are beyond what the local authority can legally provide. In completing this tool, the team must have regard to the National Framework for NHS Continuing Healthcare which sets out precise parameters to ensure consistency and fairness.

The MDT will send the DST to the individual’s local Integrated Care Board (ICB) which manages NHS funds with a recommendation as to whether they are eligible for NHS Continuing Healthcare. In most cases the ICB is expected to follow the recommendation of the MDT.

You can find the government guidance on the DST here, or check out our Resources section for free factsheets and useful links.

Get in touch if: you believe the MDT

  • failed to follow the National Framework in administering the procedure
  • failed to record all the evidence discussed in the meeting
  • ignored or marginalised your verbal evidence or that of others, or
  • failed to give adequate explanation for its decisions.

We can review the DST and assess your chances of succeeding at appeal.

3. Preparing for the assessment meeting (MDT)

The MDT will usually be very strict in insisting that any statements about the person’s needs are backed up by solid evidence. This is likely to be in the form of daily care records, care plans, risk assessments, medical records and any specialist assessments. But it should also take into account any verbal evidence supplied by the carers and family members. In reality, written evidence usually carries far more weight. So it is vital you gather as much clinical documentation as you can about the extent and severity of the care needs, the challenges in meeting these and whether the condition makes the care needs unpredictable. It is also vital to ensure that the care records fully reflect the amount of time, skill and attention carers are putting in to meeting the needs and managing any risks to the individual themselves or to others. This will help determine if there is a primary health need.

For more information on preparing for an MDT, check out our Resources section with free factsheets and useful links.

Get in touch if:

  • you would like us to cast a professional eye over your evidence ahead of an assessment,
  • you need written representations to be sent to the ICB ahead of the meeting, or
  • you need someone to represent you in the meeting itself.

4. An eligible outcome

If the ICB’s decision is that the individual is eligible, it must cover the full cost of their eligible needs or in some cases, enter into an agreement with the local authority to share the cost. The ICB will be responsible for drawing up a personal care and support plan which will outline the type and level of care required and the setting in which the care will be delivered (e.g., at home, in a care home, etc.). This should usually be put in place within 28 days.

Get in touch if:

  • you have received an eligible outcome but you have not succeeded in getting a personal care and support plan.

5. What can you do if you have an “ineligible” outcome

You have six months to appeal an ineligible outcome via a local review process carried out by the ICB itself. This is worth doing if you believe the DST is not an accurate reflection of the individual’s needs at the time of the MDT. The appeal panel, made up of different assessors, should look at the evidence anew as well as any further evidence you can provide and come to its own decision on whether there was a “primary health need” at the time.

Find details of how to contact your local ICB here. For more information on how to appeal, check out our Resources section with free factsheets and useful links.

Get in touch if:

  • you are not sure if you have sufficient grounds for an appeal to the ICB and need a professional opinion on your chances of success;
  • you need help drafting an appeal; or
  • you would like professional representation at the meeting.

6. Appealing to NHS England

If you believe the ICB Appeal panel has failed to adequately address the isues you raised or has continued to give an inaccurate or incomplete picture of the needs, you can appeal to NHS England. It will convene an Independent Review Panel. This panel should look at your whole case from the beginning with fresh eyes. You must fill in the relevant forms giving your grounds for appealing and provide all the evidence you think is relevant.

If you are still unhappy with the outcome, you may be able to appeal to the Parliamentary and Health Services Ombudsman (PHSO).

For more information on Independent Review Panels, go to the NHS website. Find more information on the PHSO here. Or check out our Resources section with free factsheets and useful links.

Get in touch if:

  • you are not sure if you have sufficient grounds for an appeal to NHS England and need a professional opinion on your chances of success.
  • you need help drafting an appeal for the Independent Review panel; or
  • you would like professional representation at the meeting.

7. Reviews of eligibility

NHS Continuing Healthcare will be subject to regular reviews – usually at least annually. The review should look at whether the person’s care needs are still being met, but it will also check whether the needs have changed to such an extent that a full eligibility reassessment is required. We know from experience that ICBs will often carry out a full reassessment of eligibility just because the needs appear more stable, even if this is purely because they are being well-managed. (Well-managed needs are still needs.) It is therefore vital to prepare fully for an NHS CHC review and not assume it will be a mere formality.

For more information on NHS CHC reviews, check out our Resources section with free factsheets and useful links.

Get in touch if:

  • you want to challenge a review that has wrongly identified a change in needs
  • you are facing a full reassessment and need help preparing.

8. What to do if your funding is withdrawn

NHS CHC reviews can lead to unfair withdrawals of funding. This is where the ICB claims the needs have reduced, even when you know they have not and that the consequences of removing the care package are potentially catastrophic. For more information on what to do if this happens, check out our Resources section with free factsheets and useful links.

Get in touch if

  • you feel that NHS CHC funding has been withdrawn without justification and you wish to appeal this decision. (Withdrawals can be appealed in exactly the same way as initial denials of funding, both at local and national level as in Points 5 and 6 above.)

Posted by Rosalind Hughes, Founder, Just Caring Legal, on 05/02/2025

How to navigate the NHS Continuing Healthcare system – and identify when you need help Read More »

What if I’m found Ineligible for NHS Continuing Healthcare?

What happens when you’re found ineligible for NHS Continuing Healthcare funding

Sometimes people may be found ineligible for NHS Continuing Healthcare funding and may not know what to do next. There are still options however. If a person is found ineligible for NHS Continuing Healthcare funding that does not mean that there is no right to challenge the decision outcome.

Appeals and complaints

If you think that the process was flawed, the healthcare needs were ‘downplayed’ or the eligibility criteria for NHS Continuing Healthcare funding has been applied incorrectly, then you may lodge a complaint or an appeal depending on what stage of the process you are at.

The appeals process can take time, and some people have struggled with huge delays in their case. However, everyone does have the right to challenge the outcome. This can be in the form of complaints, local dispute resolutions, through an Independent Review Panel, the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman and you can even seek leave for Judicial Review. It is advisable that a case is made as strong as possible as early as possible. Anecdotal evidence from clients shows that they often think they can navigate the NHS Continuing Healthcare funding system alone but then find it too complicated once they are in it. To potentially save money, you could invest in legal representation to attempt to make your case as strong as possible and to avoid the appeals process all together, if possible, and to try to avoid paying out whilst a resolution is reached.

There’s always next time

If your health deteriorates further, you can request to start the process again for NHS Continuing Healthcare funding by asking for the Checklist tool to be carried out. There is nothing to say that you can’t be assessed again if your health needs do change and/or deteriorate. It may be that you are deemed ineligible for NHS Continuing Healthcare right now but this could change in the future if your condition worsens.

How Just Caring Legal can help.

Just Caring Legal is a solicitors’ firm specialising in NHS Continuing Healthcare. We can guide people throughout the appeals process, help to ensure that the National Framework is applied correctly and prepare robust medio-legal arguments to help to strengthen your case.

If you think that you may have been wrongly found ineligible for full care funding through NHS Continuing Healthcare then contact Just Caring Legal today. You can speak with Rosalind Hughes about your case during a free initial consultation where Rosalind will be able to advise you on the services she can offer.

Call us now on 0191 556 1078 or email us at [email protected]

What if I’m found Ineligible for NHS Continuing Healthcare? Read More »

Frequently Asked Questions on the Stages of an Eligibility Assessment for NHS Continuing Healthcare Funding

Just Caring Legal answers your frequently asked questions in regards to the stages of eligibility assessment for NHS Continuing Healthcare Funding.

What is NHS Continuing Healthcare funding?

Many people don’t realise that if they have a “primary health need” the NHS should pay their full social care fees. This is called NHS Continuing Health Care Funding (NHS CHC). People may be eligible whether they are in residential care or receive home care. Eligibility for NHS CHC is not means tested. This means it does not depend on how much money you have in the bank or whether or not you own your own home.

What is a primary health need?

The term “primary health need” does not appear in primary legislation. This causes many problems in eligibility assessments for NHS CHC. After all, most adults who require a package of care do so for a health-related reason. This could be because they have had an accident or have an illness or disability. However, they do not all qualify for NHS Continuing Healthcare. It is the level and type of care needs that determine whether they have a primary health need. For further information see our Factsheet on this.

What is the process for assessing eligibility for NHS Continuing Healthcare?

The National Framework for NHS Continuing Healthcare sets out the principles and processes for assessing eligibility and the legal duties that local Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) must meet. There are generally two stages in an eligibility assessment for NHS CHC: an initial screening or checklist stage, and a multi-disciplinary team meeting (MDT) stage which assesses the needs in detail and gives a recommendation of whether there is a primary health need. However, for people who are deteriorating rapidly and possibly approaching the end of their life, a Fast Track process is also available.

What is the NHS Continuing Healthcare “Checklist Tool”?

Health and social care professionals use the Checklist Tool to decide relatively quickly whether you should be referred for a full NHS Continuing Healthcare assessment. It is a screening tool to work out whether your care needs are of a level or type that indicate you may require NHS continuing healthcare.

Any individual can ask for a Checklist assessment and the person you ask should then arrange it. The professionals involved should keep you and your family informed and involved. You should have the chance to contribute if you wish. This way you can make sure the assessor is aware of the full extent of care needs.

Alternatively, a social worker may do the screening when carrying out a community care assessment. Whoever it is, they should have received training in how to apply the tool.

The assessor will use the checklist tool to consider the amount of care and support an individual requires across 11 broad areas of health-related need, or “domains”. These are:

  • Behaviour*
  •  cognition (how well you can think and understand)
  • communication
  • psychological/emotional needs
  • mobility (ability to move around, risk of falling, etc)
  • nutrition
  • continence
  • skin (including wounds and ulcers)
  • breathing*
  • symptom control through drug therapies and medication*
  • altered states of consciousness*

They will score care needs on each of these – A for high, B for moderate, or C for low. They must then consider any other care needs not covered by these domains.

A full assessment is triggered if there are two or more domains identified as high-need; five or more domains identified as moderate, or one high and four moderate; or one “priority” domain (marked with an asterisk) identified as high need with any number of levels in other domains.

The CCG should, other than in exceptional circumstances, accept the assessor’s recommendation.

What is a multi-disciplinary team (MDT) for NHS Continuing Healthcare?

If the Checklist Tool establishes that you may be eligible for NHS continuing healthcare, your ICB must arrange a full assessment of your care needs. It should assemble a multi-disciplinary team (MDT) specifically for this purpose. The National Framework says you should receive a full funding eligibility decision within 28 days of a positive checklist.

The MDT should consist of two professionals from different healthcare professions or one professional from a healthcare profession and one person responsible for assessing individuals for community care services. These professionals should have up-to-date knowledge of your needs, potential, and aspirations. It should look at information provided for the purpose by GPs, dieticians, psychiatrists, physiotherapists, occupational therapists and many involved in your care. It should not include finance officers – the MDT decides on care needs only, regardless of budgetary considerations.

What is the “Decision Support Tool” for NHS Continuing Healthcare?

The MDT should ensure they have complete evidence on your care needs from all necessary and relevant assessments. These should be both comprehensive and specialist.

The MDT should then use the information to populate a detailed document called a “Decision Support Tool” (DST). This is designed to maintain a level of consistency in decision-making across local CCGs. The DST is not exhaustive. It should support the MDT, in combination with the team members’ skills, knowledge and professional judgment, in applying the “primary health need” test. This must be in a way that is consistent with the law and National Framework. For more detail, see our Factsheet on ‘What is a Primary Health Need?’.

The MDT must record the full range and levels of need in the DST. They must then take this into account when making their recommendation on eligibility for NHS Continuing Healthcare. They must consider:

• what help is needed
• whether the needs are complex and what they are
• how intense or severe these needs can be
• how unpredictable they are, including any risks to the person if the right care isn’t provided at the right time.

The complexity, intensity, severity or unpredictability of needs may, in combination or alone, demonstrate a primary health need.

In most circumstances, the ICB must follow the recommendation of the MDT on eligibility for funding.

The ICB should not make decisions on eligibility in the absence of an MDT recommendation unless exceptional circumstances require an urgent decision.

What is the “Fast-Track Pathway Tool” for NHS Continuing Healthcare?

The National Framework on NHS CHC says Individuals with a rapidly deteriorating condition that may be entering a terminal phase, can be fast-tracked for immediate provision of NHS Continuing Healthcare funding. A special Fast Track Pathway Tool exists to facilitate quick decisions about Continuing Healthcare funding so that appropriate support can be put in place immediately. It is designed for use only by an appropriate clinician, i.e. a medical practitioner responsible for the individual’s diagnosis, treatment or care such as a consultant, registrar, GP or registered nurse. The clinician should have sufficient knowledge of the individual to be able to able to reasonably comment on whether their condition is entering a terminal phase.

Upon receipt of a Fast-Track Pathway tool, the ICB must accept without question the clinician’s judgment that the person is eligible for NHS Continuing Healthcare and action this immediately based on the care plan. The funding can then only be withdrawn if the ICB carries out a full NHS Continuing Healthcare eligibility assessment first.

By Rosalind Hughes, founder, Just Caring Legal

Frequently Asked Questions on the Stages of an Eligibility Assessment for NHS Continuing Healthcare Funding Read More »

What Is a “Primary Health Need” for the Purposes of NHS Continuing Healthcare?

The concept of a “primary health need” is key to deciding whether a person is eligible for NHS Continuing Healthcare. NHS Continuing Healthcare is personal health and social care funded by NHS Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs). This can be in a residential or nursing facility or at home.  Where an individual has a “primary health need” the NHS is responsible for providing for all of that individual’s assessed needs.

What is the legal definition of a “primary health need”?

The term “primary health need” does not appear in primary legislation. This causes many problems in eligibility assessments for NHS Continuing Healthcare. After all, most adults who require a package of health and social care support do so for a health-related reason . This could be because they have had an accident or have an illness or disability. However, they do not all qualify for NHS Continuing Healthcare.  It is the level and type of care needs that determine whether they have a primary health need.

The Court of Appeal ruled on the line between a primary health need and other care needs in 1999. This landmark case has come to be known as “Coughlan”. The key question was whether the local authority could lawfully provide nursing care for chronically ill patients. If it could, patients might have to pay for it depending on their means. If not, it must be provided free of charge by the NHS.

What did the Coughlan case establish?

The Court of Appeal decided the local authority could lawfully provide some nursing care. But it said the scale and type of nursing required in an individual case may mean that it would not be appropriate to regard some or all of it as something the local authority can provide. But there was “no precise line” between nursing services which are and  are not capable of being treated as included in a local authority package of care services.

However, as a very general indication, the court said, “If the nursing services are (i) merely incidental or ancillary to the provision of the accommodation which a local authority is under a duty to provide…and (ii) of a nature which it can be expected that an authority whose primary responsibility is to provide social services can be expected to provide, then they can be provided [by the local authority].”

How does the NHS assess whether someone has a “primary health need”?

Since 2007 there has been a National Framework on NHS Continuing Healthcare. It is meant to guide Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) in assessing whether someone has a “primary health need”.

The National Framework says that a “primary health need” is “not about the reason why someone requires care or support”.  Nor is it dependent on a diagnosis.  It is rather about the person’s “overall actual day-to-day care needs taken in their totality”.

The National Framework sets out certain characteristics of care needs – their nature, intensity, complexity and unpredictability. Some or all of these are likely to have implications for the quantity and quality of care a person needs. They may alone or in combination point to the need for care over and above what a local authority can expect to provide. In other words, they may point to a “primary health need”.

The National Framework provides a list of questions to aid the decision-making process. But it explicitly says that this list of questions is not exhaustive. Assessors should consider each case on its own merits when deciding whether someone has a “primary health need”.

The nature of the needs

The assessment should look at all the individual’s physical, mental health or psychological needs. Next it should describe the overall effect of those needs on the individual. Finally, it should look at both the quality and quantity of interventions required to manage them.

  • How does the individual or the practitioner describe the person’s needs – adjectives used, etc?
  • What is the impact of the needs on overall health and well-being?
  • What types of interventions does the person require to meet the needs?
  • Could anyone anticipate and address their needs? Or is particular knowledge/skill/training required?
  • Is the person’s condition deteriorating/improving?
  • What would happen if needs were not met in a timely way?

Intensity and severity of needs

This relates both to the extent (‘quantity’) and severity (‘degree’) of the needs. It also relates to the support required to meet them.

  • How severe is this need?
  • How often does the person require an intervention?
  • For how long do they require each intervention?
  • How many carers do they require for these interventions?
  • Do the needs relate to one or more “domains” –  Behaviour, Cognition, Psychological and Emotional Needs, Communication, Mobility, Nutrition, Continence, Skin (including tissue viability), Breathing, Drug Therapies and Medication for Symptom Control, Altered States of Consciousness, and Other Significant Care Needs.

Complexity of the needs

This is concerned with how the needs present and interact with each other. Basically the more complex this picture, the greater the skill to manage care successfully. Complex needs may arise from a single condition, multiple conditions or the interaction of conditions. An individual’s response to their own condition may also have an impact on their overall needs, for example where a physical health need results in the individual developing a mental health need.

  • How difficult is it to manage the care need(s) and to alleviate the needs and symptoms?
  • Are the care needs interrelated?
  • Do they impact on each other to make the needs even more difficult to address?
  • How much specific knowledge and/or skill do carers need to address the need(s)?
  • Do the individual’s responses make it more difficult to provide appropriate support?

Unpredictability of the needs

Often care needs fluctuate – usually because of an unstable or deteriorating condition. This can create challenges in successfully managing them. And it can also create risks if an unanticipated need is not met in an adequate and timely way.

  • Is the individual or those who support him/her able to anticipate when need(s) might arise?
  • Does the level of need often change? Does this mean the level of support they need changes at short notice?
  • Is the condition unstable?
  • What happens if needs aren’t addressed when they arise? How significant are the consequences?
  • To what extent do carers require specific knowledge and/or skill to respond spontaneously and appropriately?
  • What level of monitoring/review does the person need?

How should assessors apply the “primary health need” test?

The National Framework says assessors should take a “practical approach” to applying the “primary health need” test. To help improve consistency in this, the Government developed a national Decision Support Tool (DST). This helps trained practitioners assess the nature, complexity, intensity and unpredictability of overall care needs. However, they should not base a decision on whether someone has a “primary health need” on the DST alone. The thresholds are “indicative” not “prescriptive”. Practitioners must use their skills, knowledge and professional judgement to decide on the totality of care needs and whether these constitute a “primary health need”.

For example, an individual may have needs that do not easily fit into the care domains in the DST. In such circumstances, it is the responsibility of the assessors to determine the extent and type of the need, to record it, and to take it into account when deciding whether they have a primary health need.

Please note: this factsheet is designed to give general information only. If you require specific advice about NHS Continuing Healthcare or other care fee problems, please contact us and we will be happy to help.

What Is a “Primary Health Need” for the Purposes of NHS Continuing Healthcare? Read More »